<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TeXML is not at XML Prague 2010</title>
	<link>http://uucode.com/blog/2010/02/12/texml-is-not-at-xml-prague-2010/</link>
	<description>advocating olpa's open source developments</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Fuller</title>
		<link>http://uucode.com/blog/2010/02/12/texml-is-not-at-xml-prague-2010/#comment-15705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://uucode.com/blog/2010/02/12/texml-is-not-at-xml-prague-2010/#comment-15705</guid>
		<description>I would say keep on trying ... remember that XML Prague is a single track conference and we have an obligation (and a real challenge) to try and have a set of talks that are coherent when contrasted against each other.

As everyone goes to the same talk, its important that we have talks which are singularly interesting across a broad appeal ... as you will have a % of people in each talk who may not normally attend such a talk. You need to add some 'surprise' and new angle (without superfluous invention) ... I would say there are a number of older hands familiar with the tech your paper described, whats the magic trick is to create a paper which inspires them as well as younger people who may have not been exposed.

I will make a special point to look for your submission next year and looking forward to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say keep on trying &#8230; remember that XML Prague is a single track conference and we have an obligation (and a real challenge) to try and have a set of talks that are coherent when contrasted against each other.</p>
<p>As everyone goes to the same talk, its important that we have talks which are singularly interesting across a broad appeal &#8230; as you will have a % of people in each talk who may not normally attend such a talk. You need to add some &#8217;surprise&#8217; and new angle (without superfluous invention) &#8230; I would say there are a number of older hands familiar with the tech your paper described, whats the magic trick is to create a paper which inspires them as well as younger people who may have not been exposed.</p>
<p>I will make a special point to look for your submission next year and looking forward to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olpa</title>
		<link>http://uucode.com/blog/2010/02/12/texml-is-not-at-xml-prague-2010/#comment-15647</link>
		<dc:creator>olpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://uucode.com/blog/2010/02/12/texml-is-not-at-xml-prague-2010/#comment-15647</guid>
		<description>I'd say "promised for ages", not "has been done". Existing approaches work only in a controlled environment, when the source documents do not contain images and tables. (Well, it's an exaggeration, but not big.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say &#8220;promised for ages&#8221;, not &#8220;has been done&#8221;. Existing approaches work only in a controlled environment, when the source documents do not contain images and tables. (Well, it&#8217;s an exaggeration, but not big.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://uucode.com/blog/2010/02/12/texml-is-not-at-xml-prague-2010/#comment-15646</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://uucode.com/blog/2010/02/12/texml-is-not-at-xml-prague-2010/#comment-15646</guid>
		<description>converting xml to tex has been done for ages!
Just look at tei-c.

for the top conferences, 25% acceptance rates and bewlow are normal. so no worry... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>converting xml to tex has been done for ages!<br />
Just look at tei-c.</p>
<p>for the top conferences, 25% acceptance rates and bewlow are normal. so no worry&#8230; :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

